For You

Jackie Speier Demands Trump Cancel Rallies Over Coronavirus, Silent On Democrat Rallies

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., questions Ambassador Kurt Volker, former special envoy to Ukraine, and Tim Morrison, a former official at the National Security Council, as they testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on November 19, 2019. - President Donald Trump faces more potentially damning testimony in the Ukraine scandal as a critical week of public impeachment hearings opens Tuesday in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) told MSNBC on Sunday that President Donald Trump should cancel his campaign rallies due to the coronavirus, but said nothing about the Democratic candidates needing to cancel their rallies.

In a highly politicized interview, Speier said that the biggest problem with the coronavirus outbreak was that the American public does not “have any confidence in the president,” and that Trump was responsible for “more and more people” who are “getting sick,” despite having no evidence to substantiate her claims.
“The fact that he is not willing to cancel his various rallies suggests that he is willing to place even his most ardent supporters at risk,” Speier said. “Because we’re supposed to stay six feet away from other persons in order to mitigate the exchange of those viruses. I think that he is showing, unfortunately, why he is so ill-prepared to guide our country during this time of crisis.”
Rep Jackie Speier (D-CA) stokes fears over coronavirus. She claims @realDonaldTrump wants his own supporters to get sick by going to his rallies (though she coincidentally makes no mention of Bernie Sanders or Joe Biden saying they won't cancel their rallies). What a monster.


ALEX WITT: Joining me now California representative, Jackie Speier, a member of the intelligence and oversight and reform committees. Congresswoman, welcome to you.
REP. JACKIE SPEIER (D-CA): Thank you, Alex.
WITT: Your district, as you know, very near Oakland there across the bay where the grand princess docks tomorrow. Are you getting any sense alarm and fear from your constituents over this? I’m curious how concerned you are about the situation. Let me just tell you anecdotally I have a staff writer on my show who parents live in San Francisco and he said, ‘they’re freaking out.’
SPEIER: Well I don’t think freaking out is what we should be doing. But we have taken this very seriously. And we have really shut down most large events in the area. I had two speeches yesterday that were canceled. So the responsible thing to do is cancel these events that have large numbers of people. I also think that California is a hot spot. We have about 25% of all of the cases in the country. And I want to make sure that the resources are going to be there to do the testing. You know what is most disturbing to me, Alex, is that South Korea and the United States found out on the same day, January 20th, that they had a Coronavirus case. In that interim, South Korea has tested 140,000 people and the United States has tested less than 1,500. It is an abysmal failure and I think the administration has done a very poor job of indicating to the American people that this is serious. This is not just the flu. We have people working from home now. We have ICUs that are full. We don’t have the requisite number of respirators. We have not taken this seriously enough and frankly the fact that we have not tested large numbers of potentially sick people is a serious crisis.
WITT: Those numbers are stunning. I wish you could have seen my jaw drop when you put out the numbers in the difference between the United States and South Korea testing but is there anything you could give to the administration, is it possible that lack of preparation in terms of tests, is there anything that the administration can give to you that explains why the discrepancy in these numbers?
SPEIER: You know, Anthony Fauci has been forthright about this and I give him credit. The biggest problem we have right now is that we don’t have any confidence in the president because he doesn’t tell the truth. And because he doesn’t tell the truth, more and more people are getting sick, there is more community spread, it is time for us to recognize that this is serious.
WITT: I have an indication of how you’re going to react to this nonetheless, ma’am, I want to play what the president said about the grand princess while visiting the CDC on Friday. Here it is, everyone.
TRUMP: They would like to have the people come off. I would rather have them stay but I go with them and I told them to make the final decision. I would rather, because I like the numbers being where they are, I don’t need to have the numbers double because of one ship that wasn’t our fault.
WITT: What is your reaction to that?
SPEIER: He talks about numbers. These are people’s lives. These cruise ships are petri — petri dishes for the virus to spread. I appreciate that Vice President Pence said that he wants them to take precaution and frankly I think the CDC should issuing guidance cruise ship because the industry is going to collapse out of its own negligence and the fact that we don’t have leadership with in our national institute of health providing the keep of guidance that is necessary. Think about the number of people that tested positive on the grand princess. Vast number of them are crew. How many of those crew were actually touching food? How many of them were in the kitchens? How many of them were in communication with so many of the persons on that ship that were touching them. I think — this is not just the flu and I think that message has got to get through to all of us. We have to take this seriously. We have to take precautions. We have got to prevent community spread and for the president to say that he’s talking about numbers an the cruise ship should just stay out there, I mean it shows you his absolute disregard for his job.
WITT: Last question to, you, ma’am, what do you need to hear from the president and do you think you’ll hear it regarding the Coronavirus.
SPEIER: I don’t think the president is capable of telling us the truth about the coronavirus. And I regret saying that. I think we have to rely on the scientists who are attempting to tell the truth even when they have to contradict the president. The fact that he is not willing to cancel his various rallies suggests that he is willing to place even his most ardent supporters at risk. Because we’re supposed to stay six feet away from other persons in order to mitigate the exchange of those viruses. I think that he is showing, unfortunately, why he is so ill-prepared to guide our country during this time of crisis.

_______________________________Second Article For You______________________

Hillary 2020? It Looks Like Clinton Is Preparing Her Hostile Takeover Of The Nomination After Interview With CNN Reporter Zakaria Where She Would Not Endorse Biden.

Hillary Clinton is not playing around when it comes to the 2020 presidential election and her disdain for one of the Democrat candidates, namely Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The former secretary of state has still not gotten over how she says the Vermont senator and his supporters treated her in 2016.
But it looks like she also has not gotten over her own defeat to President Donald Trump in 2016, which is why it looks like she could be planning her own coronation.

WATCH: Hillary Clinton refuses to endorse Joe Biden, after saying that Bernie Sanders isn't the "strongest nominee against Donald Trump."

CNN's Fareed Zakaria quickly points out that there isn't anybody left in the Democrat's primary.

Embedded video

If neither Biden nor Sanders get the party’s nomination by acquiring the needed delegates before the Democrat convention she could emerge as the candidate.
With Sanders not being a Democrat and Biden’s cognitive abilities in question the party might not feel comfortable nominating either and could see Clinton as their backup plan.
This might seem like a wild idea and it is a reach, but does Clinton see it that way? Consider what she said to CNN host Fareed Zakaria on Sunday.
“I’m not endorsing,” she said before she again laced into Sanders and his supporters and said Biden had the better chance of winning.
“I think what Joe’s victories on Super Tuesday showed is that he is building the kind of coalition that I had basically,” she said.
“It’s a broad-based coalition. I finished, you know, most of the work I needed to do for the nomination on Super Tuesday, and then it kind of lingered on, and I think Joe is on track to doing exactly the same thing: putting together a coalition of voters who are energized,” she said.
She mentions that Biden is doing things like she did, so she should endorse him as other establishment Democrats did, but she declines to.
She took on Sanders and his supporters saying that they should back Biden if he gets the nomination but, again did not endorse the former vice president.
“I hope so because his failure and the behavior of a lot of his top aides, and certainly many of his supporters — up to the convention, at the convention, and even up to Election Day was not helpful,“ she said of the 2016 race,” she said.
“I had thought we would unify, that’s what we’d always done before and that’s what I expected. I certainly tried to do that when I ran against Barack Obama and worked very hard for him,” she said.
Her disdain for Sanders is apparent and it is unlikely she would do a ton of work, if any, to get him elected if he won the general.
Then there is no good reason, considering what she has said, that she would not endorse Biden, unless she has a plan B and that plan B is her.

No comments